Seminari periodici
DIPARTIMENTO DI MATEMATICA

Topics in Mathematics 2023/2024

pagina web ufficiale
Organizzato da: Eleonora Cinti, Giacomo De Palma

Seminari passati

The use of Lie symmetries for differential equations has been tremendous, and many textbooks are available. A major drawback of Lie’s method is that it is useless when applied to systems of first-order equations, e.g. Hamiltonian equations, because they admit an infinite number of Lie symmetries, and there is no systematic way to find even one-dimensional Lie symmetry algebra, apart from trivial groups like translations in time admitted by autonomous systems. However, in 1996 I have remarked that any system of first-order equations could be transformed into an equivalent system where at least one of the equations is of second order. Then, the admitted Lie symmetry algebra is no longer infinite dimensional, and hidden symmetries of the original system could be retrieved: consequently I determined hidden symmetries of the Kepler problem. Since then, with my co-authors, I have found hidden symmetries uncovering the linearity of nonlinear superintegrable systems in two and three dimensions, even in the presence of a static electromagnetic field. In the Avertissement to his Mécanique Analitique (1788), Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736-1813) wrote in French: "Those who love Analysis will, with joy, see mechanics become a new branch of it, and will be grateful to me for thus having extended its field. (Tr. J.R. Maddox). Although it may seem a joke, we show that it has actually dire consequences for the physical reality of Mechanics, in particular by means of the Jacobi last multiplier, and its connection with Lie symmetries. In 1918 Noether published her landmark paper, and since then her namesake theorem has been applied in different areas of Physics, especially classical Lagrangian mechanics and general relativity. In this seminar, I will show the application of Noether symmetries in the quantization of classical mechanics, a quantization method that preserves the Noether point symmetries and consequently gives rise to the Schroedinger equation of various classical problems.
An elementary argument (for sure well-known to the operator theory community) allows to compare the orthogonal projection of a Hilbert space H onto a given closed subspace of H, with (any) bounded non-orthogonal projection acting among the same spaces: this yields an operator identity that is valid in the Hilbert space H. This paradigm has deep implications in analysis, at least in two settings: -in the specific context where the Hilbert space consists of the square-integrable functions along the boundary of a rectifiable domain D in Euclidean space, taken with with respect to, say, induced Lebesgue measure ds (the Lebesgue space L^2(bD)), and the closed subspace is the holomorphic Hardy space H^2(D). In this context the orthogonal projection is the Szego projection, and the non-orthogonal projection is the Cauchy transform (for planar D), or a so-called Cauchy-Fantappie’ transform (for D in C^n with n¥geq 2). -in the specific context where the Hilbert space is the space of square-integrable functions on a domain D in Euclidean space taken with respect to Lebesgue measure dV, and the closed subspace is the Bergman space of functions holomorphic in D that are square-integrable on D. Here the orthogonal projection is the Bergman projection, and the non-orthogonal projection is some ``solid’’ analog of the Cauchy (or Cauchy-Fantappie’) transform. A prototypical problem in both of these settings is the so-called ``L^p-regularity problem’’ for the orthogonal projection where p¥neq 2. This is because the Szego and Bergman projections, which are trivially bounded in L^2 (by orthogonality), are also meaningful in L^p, p¥neq 2 but proving their regularity in L^p is in general a very difficult problem which is of great interest in the theory of singular integral operators (harmonic analysis). Three threads emerge from all this: (1) a link between the (geometric and/or analytic) regularity of the ambient domain and the regularity properties of these projection operators. (2) applications to the numerical solution of a number of boundary value problems on a planar domain D that model phenomena in fluid dynamics. For a few of these problems there can be no representation formula for the solution: numerical methods are all there is. (3) the effect of dimension: for planar D the projection operators are essentially two and can be studied either directly or indirectly via conformal mapping (allowing for a great variety of treatable domains); as is well known, in higher dimensional Euclidean space there is no Riemann mapping theorem: conformal mapping is no longer a useful tool. On the other hand the basic identity in L^2 (see above) is still meaningful but geometric obstructions arise (the notion of pseudoconvexity) that must be reckoned with.
Dong Han Kim
Diophantine approximation on circles and spheres
nell'ambito della serie: TOPICS IN MATHEMATICS 2023/2024
algebra e geometria
analisi matematica
interdisciplinare
sistemi dinamici